General blockchain technology and innovation
View all tags
AI agents now outnumber human financial services workers 96-to-1, yet they remain "unbanked ghosts" unable to hold wallets, sign transactions, or build credit history. Warden Protocol is betting that the missing piece isn't smarter AI—it's blockchain infrastructure that treats agents as first-class economic citizens.
When Robinhood announced it was building an Ethereum Layer 2 using Arbitrum's technology in June 2025, it signaled something far more significant than another exchange adding blockchain features. It marked the moment when "enterprise rollups"—Layer 2 networks built or adopted by major corporations—became the defining trend reshaping Ethereum's scaling narrative. But as Kraken, Uniswap, and Sony follow suit, a critical question emerges: are we witnessing the democratization of blockchain infrastructure, or the beginning of corporate capture?
The numbers tell a compelling story. Layer 2 Total Value Locked has surged from under $4 billion in 2023 to roughly $47 billion by late 2025. Transaction costs have plummeted below $0.01, and average throughput now exceeds 5,600 transactions per second. Yet beneath these impressive metrics lies an uncomfortable truth: the Layer 2 landscape has bifurcated into a handful of winners and a graveyard of ghost chains.
2025 exposed the brutal reality of Layer 2 economics. While Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism collectively process nearly 90% of all L2 transactions, most new launches have become ghost towns shortly after their token generation events. The pattern is distressingly consistent: incentive-driven activity ahead of airdrops, followed by rapid collapse as liquidity and users migrate elsewhere.
This concentration has profound implications. The Optimism Superchain now accounts for 55.9% of all L2 transactions, with 34 OP Chains securing billions in value. Base alone represents 46.6% of all L2 DeFi TVL, extending what has been essentially uninterrupted exponential growth since launch. Arbitrum maintains roughly 31% of L2 DeFi TVL, though its position increasingly depends on institutional adoption rather than retail speculation.
The lesson is clear: distribution and strategic partnerships, not technical differentiation, are becoming the primary drivers of L2 success.
When Robinhood unveiled its Arbitrum-based Layer 2 in June 2025, it came with an audacious proposition: tokenize 2,000+ stocks and bypass traditional market hours entirely. The initiative, dubbed "Stock Tokens," allows European customers to trade U.S. stocks and ETFs on-chain with zero commission fees, complete with dividend payments within the brokerage app.
What makes Robinhood's approach notable is scope. The tokenized offerings include not just public equities but privately traded giants like OpenAI and SpaceX—assets previously inaccessible to retail investors. CEO Vlad Tenev positioned it as "showing what's possible when crypto meets transparency, access, and innovation."
The Arbitrum Foundation has since claimed that institutional finance moved from trials to production on its stack, citing Robinhood's tokenized equities rollout alongside RWA deployments with Franklin Templeton, WisdomTree, BlackRock, and Spiko.
Crypto exchange Kraken launched its Layer 2 "Ink" ahead of schedule in December 2024, built on Optimism's OP Stack and integrated into the broader Superchain ecosystem. The network received 25 million OP tokens in grants from the Optimism Foundation—a substantial vote of confidence.
Ink's strategy differs from Robinhood's equity focus. The Ink Foundation announced plans to launch and airdrop an INK token, directly challenging Coinbase's Base for exchange-affiliated L2 dominance. The ecosystem already features Tydro, a white-label instance of Aave v3 that supports the INK token, positioning Ink as a full-fledged DeFi destination rather than a mere extension of exchange services.
With Kraken considering an IPO as early as Q1 2026, Ink represents a strategic asset that could significantly enhance the company's valuation by demonstrating blockchain infrastructure capabilities.
Uniswap's Unichain officially launched on February 11, 2025, after four months of testnet activity that saw 95 million transactions and 14.7 million smart contracts deployed. Unlike corporate entrants, Unichain represents DeFi's first attempt to own its own execution environment.
The technical specifications are impressive: one-second block times at launch, with 250-millisecond "sub-blocks" promised soon. Transaction costs run approximately 95% lower than Ethereum L1. But Unichain's most significant innovation may be philosophical—it's the first L2 to build blocks inside a trusted execution environment (TEE), bringing unprecedented transparency to block building while mitigating extractive MEV.
Crucially, Unichain transforms UNI from a governance token into a utility token. Holders can stake to validate transactions and earn sequencer fees, creating economic alignment between the protocol and its community. Nearly 100 major crypto products are already building on Unichain, including Circle, Coinbase, Lido, and Morpho.
Sony's Soneium, launched January 14, 2025, represents the most ambitious corporate Web3 bet outside the financial sector. Built with Startale Labs, Soneium positions itself as a "versatile general-purpose blockchain platform" for gaming, finance, and entertainment applications.
The traction has been substantial: over 500 million transactions, 5.4 million active wallets, and more than 250 live decentralized applications. Sony doubled down with an additional $13 million investment in Startale in January 2026, specifically to scale "on-chain entertainment infrastructure."
Soneium's killer app may be IP integration. The platform supports flagship properties including Solo Leveling, Seven Deadly Sins, Ghost in the Shell, and Sony's robotic companion aibo. With Sony owning some of the world's most valuable intellectual property—God of War, Spiderman—Soneium allows the entertainment giant to control how that IP is used in the digital world.
The "Soneium For All" incubator, launched with funding up to $100,000 per project, targets MVP-ready gaming and consumer applications, while Sony Bank plans to issue a dollar-pegged stablecoin for use within Sony's gaming, anime, and content ecosystems by fiscal year 2026.
The enterprise rollup trend reveals a clear preference for established, battle-tested infrastructure. All four major enterprise entrants chose either OP Stack (Kraken, Sony, Uniswap) or Arbitrum (Robinhood) rather than building from scratch or using newer alternatives.
This standardization creates powerful network effects. The Superchain model means that Ink, Soneium, and Unichain can interoperate through native cross-chain messaging, sharing security and governance. Optimism's upcoming Interop Layer, planned for early 2026, will enable single-block, cross-chain message passing among Superchain L2s—a technical capability that could make chain-hopping as seamless as tab-switching.
For enterprises, the calculus is straightforward: proven security, regulatory clarity, and ecosystem integration outweigh the theoretical benefits of technical differentiation.
While OP Stack and Arbitrum dominate enterprise adoption, ZK rollups are carving out a distinct niche. ZKsync's Prividium framework sets benchmarks for enterprise-grade privacy, combining high throughput with robust confidentiality. The platform now offers Managed Services to help institutions launch and operate dedicated ZK Stack rollups with enterprise-grade reliability.
ZK rollups (Starknet, zkSync) now achieve 15,000+ TPS at $0.0001 per transaction, enabling institutional-grade scalability and compliance for tokenized assets. For high-value transactions, institutional use cases, and privacy-sensitive applications, ZK-based solutions increasingly represent the technology of choice.
Projections for 2026 suggest continued concentration. Analysts predict that by Q3 2026, Layer 2 TVL will exceed Ethereum L1 DeFi TVL, reaching $150 billion versus $130 billion on mainnet. Galaxy Digital estimates that Layer 2 solutions could process 80% of Ethereum transactions by 2028, up from approximately 35% in early 2025.
Institutional adoption continues accelerating, driven by regulatory clarity from the GENIUS Act and MiCA, alongside L2 innovations like ZK rollups and modular blockchains. According to recent surveys, 76% of global investors plan increased crypto allocations by 2026, prioritizing L2s with interoperability, governance frameworks, and traditional finance integration.
The market cap of tokenized public-market RWAs has already tripled to $16.7 billion as institutions adopted blockchains for issuance and distribution. BlackRock's BUIDL has emerged as the reserve asset underpinning a new class of on-chain cash products, validating the enterprise rollup thesis.
The enterprise rollup wave fundamentally changes Ethereum's strategic position. Public blockchains, especially Ethereum, are transitioning from experimental sandboxes to credible institutional infrastructure. Ethereum's established financial primitives and strong security model make it the preferred settlement layer—not for retail speculation, but for institutional capital markets.
Yet this transition carries risks. As major corporations build proprietary L2s, they gain significant control over user experience, fee structures, and data access. The permissionless ethos of early crypto may increasingly conflict with enterprise requirements for compliance, KYC, and regulatory oversight.
The coming years will determine whether enterprise rollups represent blockchain's path to mainstream adoption or a Faustian bargain that trades decentralization for distribution.
The enterprise rollup wars have redefined what success looks like in the Layer 2 landscape. Technical superiority matters less than distribution channels, brand trust, and regulatory positioning. Robinhood brings 23 million retail traders. Kraken brings institutional credibility and exchange liquidity. Uniswap brings DeFi's largest protocol ecosystem. Sony brings entertainment IP and 100 million PlayStation users.
This is not the permissionless revolution early crypto advocates imagined—but it may be the one that actually scales. For developers, builders, and investors navigating 2026, the message is clear: the era of "launch a chain and they will come" is over. The era of enterprise rollups has begun.
BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade RPC and API services across major blockchain networks including Ethereum L2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. For teams building the next generation of enterprise blockchain applications, explore our infrastructure solutions.
The numbers no longer whisper—they shout. Over $185 billion in real-world assets now live on blockchains, marking a 539% surge in tokenized U.S. Treasuries alone over the past 15 months. When BlackRock's tokenized treasury fund breaks $2.9 billion and the SEC quietly drops its investigation into Ondo Finance, the message is clear: tokenization has graduated from experiment to infrastructure.
Wall Street broker Bernstein has declared 2026 the beginning of a "tokenization supercycle"—not another hype cycle, but a structural transformation of how trillions in assets move, settle, and generate yield. Here's why this matters, what's driving it, and how the path to $30 trillion by 2030 is being paved in real-time.
For years, critics had a point: Ethereum's Layer 2 networks weren't really trustless. Sure, they promised fraud proofs—mechanisms that let anyone challenge invalid transactions—but those proofs were either non-existent or restricted to whitelisted validators. In practice, users trusted operators, not code.
That era ended in 2024-2025. Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base have all deployed permissionless fraud proof systems, achieving what L2Beat classifies as "Stage 1" decentralization. For the first time, the security model these rollups advertised actually exists. Here's why this matters, how it works, and what it means for the $50+ billion locked in Ethereum L2s.
When Nvidia wrote a $2 billion check to CoreWeave in January 2026, it wasn't just an investment — it was a coronation. The company that started life as "Atlantic Crypto," mining Bitcoin in 2017 from a New Jersey garage, had officially become the world's leading AI hyperscaler. But CoreWeave's trajectory is more than a single success story. It's the opening chapter of a $65 billion transformation reshaping the crypto mining industry from the ground up.
The message is clear: the future of crypto infrastructure isn't in mining coins. It's in powering artificial intelligence.
When Vitalik Buterin personally invested in a blockchain project, the crypto world pays attention. But when that project claims to deliver 100,000 transactions per second with 10-millisecond block times—making traditional blockchains look like dial-up internet—the question shifts from "why should I care?" to "is this even possible?"
MegaETH, the self-proclaimed "first real-time blockchain," launched its mainnet on January 22, 2026, and the numbers are staggering: 10.7 billion transactions processed during a seven-day stress test, sustained throughput of 35,000 TPS, and block times that dropped from 400 milliseconds to just 10 milliseconds. The project has raised over $506 million across four funding rounds, including a $450 million public token sale that was oversubscribed by 27.8x.
But behind the impressive metrics lies a fundamental trade-off that strikes at the heart of blockchain's core promise: decentralization. MegaETH's architecture relies on a single, hyper-optimized sequencer running on hardware that would make most data centers blush—100+ CPU cores, up to 4 terabytes of RAM, and 10 Gbps network connections. This isn't your typical validator setup; it's a supercomputer.
MegaETH's performance gains stem from two key innovations: heterogeneous blockchain architecture and a hyper-optimized EVM execution environment.
Traditional blockchains require every node to perform the same tasks—ordering transactions, executing them, and maintaining state. MegaETH throws out this playbook. Instead, it differentiates nodes into specialized roles:
Sequencer Nodes handle the heavy lifting of transaction ordering and execution. These aren't your garage-setup validators; they're enterprise-grade servers with hardware requirements 20 times more expensive than average Solana validators.
Prover Nodes generate and verify cryptographic proofs using specialized hardware like GPUs or FPGAs. By separating proof generation from execution, MegaETH can maintain security without bottlenecking throughput.
Replica Nodes verify the sequencer's output with minimal hardware requirements—roughly comparable to running an Ethereum L1 node—ensuring that anyone can validate the chain's state even if they can't participate in sequencing.
The result? Block times measured in single-digit milliseconds, with the team targeting an eventual 1-millisecond block time—an industry first if achieved.
MegaETH's seven-day global stress test processed approximately 10.7 billion transactions, with games like Smasher, Crossy Fluffle, and Stomp.gg generating sustained load across the network. The chain achieved peak throughput of 47,000 TPS, with sustained rates between 15,000 and 35,000 TPS.
These numbers demand context. Solana, often cited as the speed benchmark, has a theoretical maximum of 65,000 TPS but operates at around 3,400 TPS in real-world conditions. Ethereum L1 manages roughly 15-30 TPS. Even the fastest L2s like Arbitrum and Base typically process a few hundred TPS under normal load.
MegaETH's stress test numbers, if they translate to production, would represent a 10x improvement over Solana's real-world performance and a 1,000x improvement over Ethereum mainnet.
But there's a critical caveat: stress tests are controlled environments. The test transactions came primarily from gaming applications—simple, predictable operations that don't reflect the complex state interactions of DeFi protocols or the unpredictable transaction patterns of organic user activity.
Here's where MegaETH diverges sharply from blockchain orthodoxy: the project openly acknowledges it has no plans to decentralize its sequencer. Ever.
"The project doesn't pretend to be decentralized and explains why a centralized sequencer was necessary as a tradeoff to achieve their desired level of performance," notes one analysis.
This isn't a temporary bridge to future decentralization—it's a permanent architectural decision. MegaETH's sequencer is a single point of failure, controlled by a single entity, running on hardware that only well-funded operations can afford.
The security model relies on what the team calls "optimistic fraud proofs and slashing." The system's security doesn't depend on multiple entities independently arriving at the same result. Instead, it relies on a decentralized network of Provers and Replicas to verify the computational correctness of the sequencer's output. If the sequencer acts maliciously, provers should be unable to generate valid proofs for incorrect computations.
Additionally, MegaETH inherits from Ethereum through a rollup design, ensuring that even if the sequencer fails or acts maliciously, users can recover assets via Ethereum mainnet.
But critics aren't convinced. Current analyses show MegaETH has only 16 validators compared to Ethereum's 800,000+, raising governance concerns. The project also uses EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum—a choice that trades battle-tested security for lower costs and higher throughput.
MegaETH isn't just building a fast blockchain; it's building an economic moat. The project partnered with Ethena Labs to launch USDm, a native stablecoin backed primarily by BlackRock's tokenized U.S. Treasury fund BUIDL (currently over $2.2 billion in assets).
The clever innovation: USDm's reserve yield is programmatically directed toward covering sequencer operations. This allows MegaETH to offer sub-cent transaction fees without relying on user-paid gas. As network usage grows, stablecoin yield expands proportionally, creating a self-sustaining economic model that doesn't require increasing user fees.
This positions MegaETH against the traditional L2 fee model, where sequencers profit from the spread between user-paid fees and L1 data posting costs. By subsidizing fees through yield, MegaETH can undercut competitors on cost while maintaining predictable economics for developers.
MegaETH enters a crowded L2 market where Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism control approximately 90% of transaction volume. Its competitive positioning is unique:
Vs. Solana: MegaETH's 10ms block times crush Solana's 400ms, making it theoretically superior for latency-sensitive applications like high-frequency trading or real-time gaming. However, Solana offers a unified L1 experience without the complexity of bridging, and its upcoming Firedancer upgrade promises significant performance improvements.
Vs. Other L2s: Traditional rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism prioritize decentralization over raw speed. They're pursuing Stage 1 and Stage 2 fraud proofs, where MegaETH is optimizing for a different point on the trade-off curve.
Vs. Monad: Both projects target high-performance EVM execution, but Monad is building an L1 with its own consensus, while MegaETH inherits security from Ethereum. Monad launched with $255 million TVL in late 2025, demonstrating appetite for high-performance EVM chains.
MegaETH's architecture makes the most sense for specific use cases:
Real-time gaming: The 10ms latency enables on-chain game state that feels instant. The stress test's gaming focus wasn't accidental—this is the target market.
High-frequency trading: Sub-millisecond block times could enable order matching that rivals centralized exchanges. Hyperliquid has proven the appetite for high-performance on-chain trading.
Consumer applications: Apps that need Web2-like responsiveness—social feeds, interactive media, real-time auctions—could finally deliver smooth experiences without off-chain compromises.
The architecture makes less sense for applications where decentralization is paramount: financial infrastructure requiring censorship resistance, protocols handling large value transfers where trust assumptions matter, or any application where users need strong guarantees about sequencer behavior.
MegaETH's public mainnet launches February 9, 2026, transitioning from stress test to production. The project's success will depend on several factors:
Developer adoption: Can MegaETH attract developers to build applications that leverage its unique performance characteristics? Gaming studios and consumer app developers are the obvious targets.
Security track record: The sequencer centralization is a known risk. Any incident—whether technical failure, censorship, or malicious behavior—would undermine trust in the entire architecture.
Economic sustainability: The USDm subsidy model is elegant on paper, but it depends on sufficient stablecoin TVL to generate meaningful yield. If adoption lags, the fee structure becomes unsustainable.
Regulatory clarity: Centralized sequencers raise questions about liability and control that decentralized networks avoid. How regulators treat single-operator L2s remains unclear.
MegaETH represents the most aggressive bet yet on the proposition that performance matters more than decentralization for certain blockchain use cases. The project isn't trying to be Ethereum—it's trying to be the fast lane that Ethereum lacks.
The stress test results are genuinely impressive. If MegaETH can deliver 35,000 TPS with 10ms latency in production, it will be the fastest EVM-compatible chain by a significant margin. The USDm economics are clever, the team's MIT and Stanford pedigrees are strong, and Vitalik's backing adds legitimacy.
But the centralization trade-off is real. In a world where we've seen centralized systems fail—FTX, Celsius, and countless others—trusting a single sequencer requires faith in the operators and the fraud proof system. MegaETH's security model is sound in theory, but it hasn't been battle-tested against determined adversaries.
The question isn't whether MegaETH can deliver on its performance promises. The stress test suggests it can. The question is whether the market wants a blockchain that's really fast but meaningfully centralized, or whether the original vision of decentralized, trustless systems still matters.
For applications where speed is everything and users trust the operator, MegaETH could be transformative. For everything else, the jury is still out.
MegaETH's mainnet launch on February 9 will be one of 2026's most closely watched crypto events. Whether it delivers on the "real-time blockchain" promise or becomes another cautionary tale about the centralization-performance trade-off, the experiment itself advances our understanding of what's possible at the frontier of blockchain performance.
What if you could trade Apple stock at 3 AM on a Sunday, settle the transaction in seconds instead of days, and hold it in a wallet you actually control? That future is no longer hypothetical. Robinhood, the trading platform that sparked the retail investing revolution, is building its own Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain on Arbitrum — and it could fundamentally change how the world trades securities.
The company has already tokenized nearly 2,000 U.S. stocks and ETFs worth approximately $17 million, with plans to expand to private equity giants like OpenAI and SpaceX. This isn't just another crypto project; it's a brokerage with 24 million users betting that blockchain will replace the antiquated plumbing of traditional finance.
When Johann Kerbrat, Robinhood's crypto chief, announced the Layer 2 blockchain at EthCC in Cannes, he revealed the strategic calculus behind the decision: "The main discussion for us at this point was, really, should we do an L1 or should we do an L2, and the reason why we decided to do an L2 was we wanted to get the security from Ethereum, the decentralization from Ethereum, and also the liquidity that is part of the EVM space."
Launching a new Layer 1 would have required bootstrapping validators, liquidity, developer tools, and user trust from scratch. By building on Arbitrum's Orbit framework, Robinhood inherits Ethereum's battle-tested security while gaining the customization options needed for regulated financial products.
The Robinhood Chain is designed for tokenized real-world assets, with native support for:
The chain is currently on a private testnet, with a public launch expected in 2026. In the meantime, Robinhood's tokenized stocks are already live on Arbitrum One, Ethereum's largest rollup by activity.
Robinhood's tokenized equity lineup has expanded from roughly 200 assets at launch to over 2,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. According to Entropy Advisors data on Dune Analytics, the total value of these tokens sits just under $17 million — modest by crypto standards, but significant as a proof of concept for regulated securities on public blockchains.
These tokens mirror the economic rights of their underlying assets, including dividend distributions. When Apple pays its quarterly dividend, tokenized AAPL holders receive their proportional share. Settlement happens entirely on-chain via Arbitrum, bypassing the traditional T+1 (and formerly T+2) clearinghouse system that has governed stock trading for decades.
European customers currently have access to 24/5 trading — meaning the market is open around the clock during weekdays. Full 24/7 trading is on the roadmap once the Robinhood Chain launches.
Perhaps most notably, Robinhood has also made tokenized shares of pre-IPO companies like OpenAI and SpaceX available, providing retail access to typically illiquid private markets that have historically been reserved for accredited investors.
Five years after Robinhood stunned users by halting buys on GameStop and other meme stocks during the 2021 trading frenzy, CEO Vlad Tenev has been vocal about how blockchain could prevent such scenarios from recurring.
The core issue was settlement risk. When trades take one or more days to settle, clearinghouses must hold collateral against potential failures. During periods of extreme volatility, those collateral requirements can spike dramatically — as they did during the meme stock mania, forcing Robinhood to restrict trading on certain securities.
"In a world of 24-hour news cycles and real-time market reactions, T+1 is still far too long," Tenev wrote in a recent op-ed. "Friday trades can still take days to settle."
Tokenized securities solve this by enabling near-instant settlement. When you buy a tokenized stock, the transaction finalizes in seconds or minutes rather than days. "No lengthy settlement period means much less risk to the system and less pressure on both clearinghouses and brokerages," Tenev explained, "so customers can freely trade how they want, when they want."
He believes the transformation is inevitable: "Imagine explaining to someone in 2035 that markets once closed on weekends."
Robinhood isn't alone in pursuing this strategy. 2025 marked the rise of what analysts call "enterprise rollups" — major institutions launching their own Layer 2 infrastructure rather than building on existing public chains.
The trend accelerated rapidly:
The strategic insight is becoming clear: L2s win by distributing their infrastructure outward and partnering with large platforms rather than operating in isolation. A chain with 24 million existing users (Robinhood's customer base) or 56 million verified users (Coinbase's Base potential) starts with distribution advantages that pure-play crypto chains can't match.
Layer 2 Total Value Locked has grown from roughly $4 billion in 2023 to approximately $47 billion by late 2025 — a nearly 12x increase. Daily L2 transactions have exceeded 1.9 million, eclipsing Ethereum mainnet activity.
Robinhood specifically chose Arbitrum Orbit rather than alternatives like the OP Stack or building a ZK-rollup. Orbit allows the creation of highly customizable chains while inheriting Arbitrum's security model.
Key technical advantages include:
EVM Compatibility: Orbit chains are 100% compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine, meaning every smart contract that works on Ethereum works on the Robinhood Chain without modification. This opens the door to DeFi integrations — lending against tokenized stock positions, using stocks as collateral, or creating structured products.
Custom Gas Tokens: Orbit chains can use select ERC-20 tokens for gas fees instead of ETH. Robinhood could theoretically denominate transaction costs in USDC or even its own HOOD token, improving user experience for customers who don't want to hold ETH.
Configurable Governance: Unlike Arbitrum One and Nova, which are governed by the Arbitrum DAO, Orbit chains allow builders to determine their own governance structures. For a regulated brokerage, this means meeting compliance requirements around validator selection and network operation.
Data Availability Options: Orbit supports both full rollup mode (posting all data to Ethereum) and AnyTrust mode (using a data availability committee for lower fees). Robinhood can optimize for cost versus decentralization based on the asset class being traded.
Arbitrum Orbit launched in March 2023 and has since become the foundation for numerous enterprise blockchain deployments. The framework's flexibility makes it particularly suited for regulated entities that need to customize network parameters while maintaining Ethereum security.
Robinhood is positioning itself at the intersection of two massive trends: the $18.9 trillion tokenized asset opportunity and the continued growth of retail crypto adoption.
According to a joint report from Ripple and Boston Consulting Group, the tokenized asset market will grow from $0.6 trillion today to $18.9 trillion by 2033, representing a compound annual growth rate of 53%. In an optimistic scenario, the figure could reach $23.4 trillion.
The growth is already visible. Tokenized assets expanded from just $85 million in 2020 to over $21 billion by April 2025 — a 245-fold increase. Non-stablecoin tokenized RWAs grew from roughly $5 billion in 2022 to about $24 billion by mid-2025, up 380% in just a few years.
BCG projects that the banking sector will account for over a third of all tokenized assets by the end of the decade, with this share surging to over 50% by 2033. Real estate, funds, and stablecoins are expected to lead the growth.
Tibor Merey, Managing Director at BCG, noted: "Tokenization is transforming financial assets into programmable and interoperable instruments, recorded on shared digital ledgers. This enables 24/7 transactions, fractional ownership, and automated compliance."
Robinhood's early mover advantage in tokenized equities could position it to capture significant share of this market — especially given its existing distribution to retail investors who already trust the platform with their traditional investments.
The path forward isn't without obstacles. Tokenized securities exist in a regulatory gray zone in the United States, where the SEC has historically taken an enforcement-heavy approach to crypto assets.
Tenev has publicly urged lawmakers to pass the CLARITY Act, which would push the SEC to write clear rules for tokenized equities. Without regulatory clarity, the full potential of tokenized securities may remain limited to European and other international markets.
Currently, Robinhood's tokenized stock offerings are available to EU customers but not U.S. users. The company is expanding to over 400 million people across 30 EU and EEA countries, where MiCA regulations provide clearer frameworks for digital asset services.
However, the regulatory environment may be shifting. The SEC has seen leadership changes, and bipartisan crypto legislation is moving through Congress. Robinhood's bet appears to be that regulatory clarity will arrive before the Robinhood Chain's public launch — or that international adoption will generate sufficient momentum to force domestic progress.
Robinhood's L2 represents a paradigm shift for blockchain infrastructure. Previously, crypto projects hoped to onboard institutions and retail users onto existing chains. Now, institutions are building their own chains to bring crypto capabilities to existing user bases.
This has profound implications:
For Ethereum: Enterprise rollups validate Ethereum's position as the premier settlement layer for regulated assets. Every enterprise L2 increases demand for ETH as a security budget and settlement token, even if users never directly interact with mainnet.
For Arbitrum: Each Orbit deployment expands Arbitrum's ecosystem and demonstrates the viability of its technology stack. Robinhood's success would be a major endorsement of Arbitrum's enterprise readiness.
For DeFi: Tokenized stocks on EVM-compatible chains can eventually integrate with existing DeFi protocols. Imagine borrowing against your Apple stock position on Aave, or using Tesla shares as collateral for a stablecoin loan. The composability of blockchain assets could unlock entirely new financial products.
For Traditional Finance: Every major brokerage is now evaluating its blockchain strategy. Schwab, Fidelity, and Interactive Brokers will face pressure to offer similar capabilities or risk losing customers to platforms that do.
Robinhood's Layer 2 blockchain is still on a private testnet with no public launch date confirmed. But the company's moves signal a clear direction: blockchain rails for traditional assets, starting with stocks and expanding to private equity, real estate, and beyond.
When Tenev says "tokenization will unlock 24/7 markets, and once people experience it, they'll never go back," he's not making a prediction — he's describing a strategy. Robinhood is building the infrastructure to make that future inevitable.
The question isn't whether tokenized securities will become mainstream, but who will control the infrastructure when they do. With 24 million users, regulatory relationships, and now its own blockchain, Robinhood is making a serious bid to be that platform.
Within five to ten years, the concept of market hours may seem as archaic as paper stock certificates. And when that day comes, Robinhood's bet on Ethereum Layer 2 will look less like a gamble and more like the obvious move that everyone else was too slow to make.
For developers and institutions building on blockchain infrastructure, the Robinhood Chain's architecture choices offer valuable lessons in balancing decentralization with regulatory compliance. BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade RPC services and infrastructure tools for teams building on Arbitrum and other EVM-compatible chains. Explore our API marketplace to see how we can support your RWA tokenization initiatives.
When Polymarket revealed that AI agents now contribute over 30% of its trading volume, it marked a turning point that few had anticipated. These aren't simple trading bots executing predetermined rules—they're autonomous systems scanning news feeds, analyzing on-chain data, and placing bets faster than any human could. The machines have arrived on the blockchain, and they're here to trade.
But beneath this headline lies a more complex story: a growing infrastructure gap between what AI agents can theoretically accomplish and what blockchain tooling currently allows. As we enter 2026, the race to bridge this gap is reshaping everything from Ethereum standards to payment protocols.
Traditional crypto trading bots follow static rules—buy when RSI drops below 30, sell above 70. AI agents operate differently. They perceive on-chain data in real-time, reason through multi-step strategies, and adapt their behavior based on outcomes.
The distinction matters because agents don't just execute; they decide. An AI agent monitoring DeFi protocols might simultaneously assess APY across 50 lending platforms, calculate gas-adjusted returns, evaluate impermanent loss risks, and rebalance a portfolio—all within seconds. Some have achieved over 70% win rates in backtested strategies.
The numbers tell the story. According to CoinGecko, over 550 AI agent crypto projects now exist with a combined market cap exceeding $4.34 billion. Daily trading volumes hit $1.09 billion. By the end of 2025, infrastructure like RSS3's MCP Server and Olas Predict already supported agents autonomously scanning events and placing bets on platforms like Polymarket, with processing speeds far exceeding human capabilities.
Arbitrage bots on Polymarket demonstrate the efficiency gap starkly. Comparisons show bots achieving $206,000 in profits with over 85% win rates, while humans employing similar strategies capture only around $100,000. The machines aren't just competitive—they're winning.
Despite their capabilities, AI agents face fundamental limitations when operating on-chain. Three critical gaps define the current landscape: identity, payments, and trust.
The Identity Problem: In traditional finance, knowing your counterparty is straightforward. On blockchain, AI agents exist in a permissionless void. How does one agent verify another is legitimate, competent, or honest? Without identity infrastructure, agents can't build reputation, and without reputation, high-value autonomous transactions remain risky.
The Payment Problem: AI agents need to transact—paying for data feeds, API calls, and services from other agents. But current payment rails assume human involvement: login screens, session management, manual approvals. Agents need payment infrastructure that's stateless, instant, and machine-native.
The Trust Problem: When an agent provides a service—say, a risk assessment or price prediction—how can clients verify the work was done correctly? Traditional auditing doesn't scale to millions of automated transactions. Agents need on-chain validation mechanisms.
Ethereum developers are addressing these gaps with ERC-8004, a new standard expected to go live with the Glamsterdam hard fork in Q2 2026. The Ethereum Foundation has pushed this standard with unusual urgency, forming a dedicated team called dAI and collaborating with Google, Coinbase, and MetaMask on the specification.
ERC-8004 introduces three on-chain registries:
Identity Registry: Each agent receives a unique on-chain identifier via an ERC-721-style token, pointing to a registration file describing capabilities, protocols supported, and contact endpoints. Ownership can be transferred or delegated, giving agents portable, censorship-resistant identities.
Reputation Registry: Clients—human or machine—submit structured feedback about agent performance. Rather than computing scores on-chain (which is expensive), the registry stores raw signals publicly, allowing off-chain systems to build reputation models on top.
Validation Registry: Agents can request independent verification of their work. Validators might use staked services, zero-knowledge machine learning proofs, or trusted execution environments. Results are stored on-chain so anyone can see what was checked and by whom.
The design is deliberately pluggable. Trust models scale with value at risk—ordering pizza requires minimal verification; managing a treasury demands cryptographic proofs. ERC-8004 extends Google's Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol by adding the blockchain-based trust layer that open agent economies require.
While ERC-8004 handles identity and trust, Coinbase's x402 protocol tackles payments. The approach is elegantly simple: resurrect HTTP's long-unused 402 "Payment Required" status code and make it actually work.
Here's how it functions: a developer adds one line of code requiring payment for API requests. If a request arrives without payment, the server responds with HTTP 402, prompting the client to pay and retry. No new protocols, no session management—standard HTTP libraries can implement it.
Coinbase and Cloudflare announced the x402 Foundation in early 2026, aiming to establish x402 as the universal standard for AI-driven payments. The partnership makes strategic sense: embedding payment logic into the web's foundational layer requires global, low-latency infrastructure that Cloudflare uniquely provides.
The protocol is already seeing adoption. Anthropic integrated x402 with its Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing AI models to autonomously pay for context and tools. Circle Labs demonstrated an agent paying $0.01 USDC for a blockchain risk report via x402. On-chain transactions through the protocol increased more than twentyfold in the month following launch.
As the only stablecoin facilitator for Google's Agentic Payments Protocol (AP2), x402 positions itself at the intersection of two tech giants' AI strategies. Agents can now monetize their own services, pay other agents, or handle micropayments automatically—all without human intervention.
Nowhere is the AI agent opportunity more apparent than in DeFi. The fusion of DeFi and AI—dubbed "DeFAI" or "AgentFi"—promises to transform finance from manual dashboard-grinding to intelligent, self-optimizing automation.
Consider yield farming, traditionally a time-intensive activity requiring constant monitoring. AI agents change this with real-time yield scouting across dozens of protocols, automatic portfolio rebalancing, risk-adjusted optimization accounting for gas fees and impermanent loss, and natural language interfaces where users simply describe their goals.
Projects like YieldForge scan 50+ protocols, analyze risk profiles, and simulate optimal harvesting strategies through conversation. Platforms including Olas, Virtuals Protocol, ChainGPT's AI VM, and Theoriq are building decentralized agent swarms for liquidity provision.
The vision is ambitious: by mid-2026, agents could manage trillions in TVL, becoming "algorithmic whales" that provide liquidity, govern DAOs, and originate loans based on on-chain credit scores. But realizing this vision requires solving hard problems.
Despite the momentum, significant obstacles remain.
Data Quality and Latency: AI agents depend on real-time, high-fidelity data. Errors or manipulation can trigger unintended decisions with serious financial consequences. Mike Cahill from the Pyth Network emphasizes that agents require ultra-low-latency price updates sourced directly from exchanges to minimize risk from outdated or manipulated feeds.
Security Vulnerabilities: Opening blockchains to autonomous agents creates new attack surfaces. Research in 2025 demonstrated how malicious agents could exploit vulnerabilities in agent-to-agent interactions. The industry needs robust defenses before agents can safely manage significant capital.
Regulatory Uncertainty: Current legal frameworks don't recognize AI agents as persons. Actions or contracts entered by autonomous agents are attributed to human or corporate principals—but enforcement becomes murky when agents operate across jurisdictions at machine speed. "Know Your Agent" (KYA) standards may emerge as the AI equivalent of KYC requirements.
Speculation vs. Reality: Industry researchers caution that many AI agent projects remain speculative. The gap between impressive demos and production-ready infrastructure is substantial. Trust is the bottleneck for scaling agentic AI—how does one agent's output get verified by another in an open economy?
Several developments appear likely in the coming months. Retail AI agents will go mainstream with plug-and-play tools requiring no technical expertise. Major DEXs will introduce built-in "agent mode" for on-chain autonomous execution. Multi-agent trading systems will become standard at hedge funds and trading desks. Sentinel agents providing proactive security—scanning the mempool for malicious patterns before confirmation—may finally address crypto's persistent theft problem.
The most significant shift may be cultural rather than technical. In 2026, we'll stop clicking buttons and start having conversations with our wallets. Natural language intent-based transaction execution, already available in specialized DeFAI wallets, will reach mainstream crypto wallets. Projects like Morpheus allow users to run "Smart Agents" locally for complex on-chain tasks via plain language commands.
By the end of 2026, the crypto market will look nothing like 2024. The question isn't whether AI agents will transform on-chain finance—it's whether the infrastructure will be ready to support them safely.
As AI agents become critical on-chain infrastructure, the underlying blockchain networks powering these autonomous systems matter more than ever. BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade RPC and API services across Ethereum, Solana, and 20+ networks—the reliable foundation that AI agents need for real-time data access and transaction execution.
Google just made its boldest Web3 move yet. At the National Retail Federation conference on January 11, 2026, the tech giant unveiled the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP)—an open-source standard designed to let AI agents buy products on your behalf. Combined with Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL), a new Layer-1 blockchain for institutional finance, and the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) that enables stablecoin transactions, Google is quietly building the infrastructure for a $5 trillion agentic commerce revolution.
The question is no longer whether AI agents will handle your shopping—it's whether Google will own the rails.
The numbers are staggering. McKinsey projects that agentic commerce could orchestrate $900 billion to $1 trillion in US retail revenue by 2030—roughly one-third of all online sales. Globally, this opportunity ranges from $3 trillion to $5 trillion. The agentic AI market itself is projected to grow from $9.14 billion in 2026 to $139.19 billion by 2034, a 40.5% compound annual growth rate.
But here's what makes Google's timing so significant: consumer behavior is already shifting. Nearly 6% of all searches now flow through AI-powered answer engines, with retailer traffic from AI sources surging 1,200% while traditional search traffic declined 10% year-over-year. More than half of high-income millennials have already used or plan to use AI for online shopping.
Google isn't predicting this future—they're building its operating system.
Think of UCP as HTTP for shopping. Just as HTTP established a universal protocol for web communication, UCP creates a common language for AI agents to interact with any merchant, regardless of their underlying commerce stack.
The protocol was co-developed with an unprecedented coalition of retail and payment giants: Shopify, Etsy, Wayfair, Target, and Walmart helped build it, while Adyen, American Express, Best Buy, Mastercard, Stripe, The Home Depot, Visa, and over 20 others have endorsed it.
UCP enables what Google calls "agentic commerce"—AI-driven shopping agents that complete tasks end-to-end, from product discovery to checkout and post-purchase management. The architecture is deliberately modular:
What makes this approach powerful is its acknowledgment of commerce complexity. Over 20+ years, Shopify learned that varying payment options, discount stacking rules, and fulfillment permutations aren't bugs—they're emergent properties of diverse retailers. UCP is designed to model this reality while enabling autonomous AI agents.
UCP is already powering a new checkout feature on eligible Google product listings in AI Mode in Search and the Gemini app. US shoppers can now check out from eligible retailers while researching, using Google Pay with payment methods and shipping info saved in Google Wallet.
Phase 2, scheduled for late 2026, includes international expansion to markets like India and Brazil, plus post-purchase support integration. Gartner predicts that while 2026 is the "inaugural year," multi-agent frameworks may handle the majority of end-to-end retail functions by 2027.
While UCP handles the commerce layer, Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL) addresses the settlement infrastructure—and it's aimed squarely at traditional finance, not crypto natives.
GCUL is a permissioned Layer-1 blockchain designed for financial institutions. Unlike most public chains that start in the retail crypto space, GCUL is delivered as a cloud service accessible via a single API. Key features include:
The validation came from CME Group, the world's largest derivatives marketplace. On March 25, 2025, both organizations announced successful completion of the first phase of integration and testing. The goal: streamline payments for collateral, margin, settlement, and fees, enabling 24/7 global trading infrastructure.
As CME Group noted, "Google Cloud Universal Ledger has the potential to deliver significant efficiencies for collateral, margin, settlement and fee payments as the world moves toward 24/7 trading."
Full commercial services launch in 2026. The platform promises to cut cross-border payment costs by up to 70%.
Google is positioning GCUL as "credibly neutral"—a direct counter to Stripe's Tempo (merchant-focused) and Circle's Arc (USDC-focused). As Rich Widmann, Google Cloud's Web3 Head of Strategy explained: "Tether won't use Circle's blockchain—and Adyen probably won't use Stripe's blockchain. But any financial institution can build with GCUL."
This could be the first step toward Google issuing its own stablecoin. The company could incentivize stablecoin payments across its billions of dollars in ad and cloud revenue, then integrate into Google Pay—instantly making crypto payments accessible anywhere Google Pay is accepted.
The final piece of Google's infrastructure is the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed in collaboration with Coinbase, Ethereum Foundation, MetaMask, and more than 60 other organizations.
AP2 is an open protocol providing a common language for secure, compliant transactions between agents and merchants. It supports everything from credit cards to stablecoins and real-time bank transfers. But the crypto integration is where things get interesting.
Google extended AP2 with the A2A x402 extension—a production-ready solution for agent-based crypto payments. x402 revives the long-dormant HTTP 402 "Payment Required" status code, enabling instant stablecoin payments directly over HTTP.
Here's how it works in an agentic context:
This enables atomic settlement using stablecoins like USDC or USDT. For the agentic economy, this replaces "promise to pay" (credit cards) with "proof of payment" (crypto), eliminating settlement risk entirely.
As MetaMask stated: "Blockchains are the natural payment layer for agents, and Ethereum will be the backbone of this. With AP2 and x402, MetaMask will deliver maximum interoperability for developers while enabling users to pay agents with full composability and choice—while retaining the security and control of true self-custody."
By October 2025, x402 processed 500,000 weekly transactions across Base, Solana, and BNB Chain—meaningful volume that validates the model. Coinbase's developer platform offers a hosted facilitator service processing fee-free USDC payments on Base, handling verification and settlement so sellers don't need blockchain infrastructure.
One critical piece of this ecosystem is identity verification for AI agents themselves. ERC-8004 provides an on-chain "identity card" for AI agents. Before a merchant accepts an order from an autonomous bot, they can check its ERC-8004 identity on the blockchain to verify its reputation.
This prevents spam and fraud in automated systems—a crucial requirement when AI agents are spending real money without human oversight for each transaction.
Google isn't alone in this race. Amazon expanded Rufus and rolled out "Buy for Me." Shopify released agentic infrastructure for cross-merchant cart building. Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe introduced agent-capable payment frameworks.
But Google's integrated approach—UCP for commerce, GCUL for institutional settlement, AP2/x402 for crypto payments, and ERC-8004 for agent identity—represents the most comprehensive stack. The question is whether openness will win against proprietary alternatives.
IDC projects that agentic AI will represent 10-15% of IT spending in 2026, growing to 26% of budgets (approximately $1.3 trillion) by 2029. Gartner predicts 40% of enterprise applications will include task-specific AI agents by end of 2026.
The infrastructure layer—who controls the rails—may matter more than the agents themselves.
For merchants, UCP adoption is becoming table stakes. The protocol allows businesses to retain control over pricing, inventory, and fulfillment logic while enabling AI agents to operate autonomously. Integration happens via existing commerce stacks—no blockchain expertise required.
For developers building in Web3, the implications are significant:
If 2025 laid the groundwork and 2026 is the inaugural year, 2027 may determine who wins the agentic commerce platform war. The convergence of AI agents, blockchain settlement, and standardized commerce protocols creates unprecedented opportunities—and risks.
Google's bet is that open standards will attract the ecosystem while their distribution (Search, Gemini, Google Pay, Cloud) captures the value. Whether that proves true depends on execution and adoption rates that 2026 will reveal.
One thing is certain: the way we shop is about to fundamentally change. The only question is whether you'll be giving your purchasing decisions to an AI agent running on Google's rails—or someone else's.
Building blockchain infrastructure for the agentic commerce era? BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade RPC endpoints and APIs across major chains including Ethereum, Base, and Solana—the networks powering x402 payments and AI agent transactions. Start building with infrastructure designed for the next generation of autonomous commerce.