Skip to main content

DeFAI Architecture: How LLMs Are Replacing Click-Heavy DeFi With Plain English

· 12 min read
Dora Noda
Dora Noda
Software Engineer

In a research lab at MIT, an autonomous AI agent just rebalanced a $2.4 million DeFi portfolio across three blockchains — without a single human clicking "Approve" on MetaMask. It parsed a natural language instruction, decomposed it into seventeen discrete on-chain operations, competed against rival solvers for the best execution path, and settled everything in under nine seconds. The user's only input was one sentence: "Move my stablecoins to the highest yield across Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Solana."

Welcome to DeFAI — the architectural layer where large language models replace the tangled dashboards, multi-step approvals, and chain-switching headaches that have kept decentralized finance a playground for power users. With 282 crypto-AI projects funded in 2025 and DeFAI's market cap surging past $850 million, this is no longer a whitepaper narrative. It is production infrastructure, and it is rewriting the rules of how value moves on-chain.

From Imperative Transactions to Declarative Intents​

Traditional DeFi forces users to think like machines. Swapping tokens on Uniswap requires selecting the exact pair, setting slippage tolerance, approving a token contract, confirming the transaction, and monitoring for failures — each step a potential error point. Cross-chain operations multiply this complexity by an order of magnitude: bridge selection, gas estimation on two networks, liquidity depth analysis, and MEV exposure management.

Intent-based architecture flips the model. Instead of specifying how a transaction should execute, users declare what they want to achieve. An intent is a signed message — a declarative statement of a desired outcome. The execution details are offloaded to a competitive network of specialized actors called solvers, who race to fulfill the intent at the best possible price.

The architecture works in three stages:

  1. Intent Expression. The user states their goal: "Swap 1,000 USDC on Ethereum for ETH on Arbitrum at the best available price within 10 minutes." This can be expressed through a structured interface or, increasingly, through natural language processed by an LLM.

  2. Solver Competition. The intent is broadcast to a network of solvers who analyze market conditions across DEXs, bridges, lending markets, and liquidity pools. Each solver simulates potential execution paths and submits their best offer. The winning solver bundles the transaction and pays gas on the user's behalf.

  3. Settlement. The user signs once and receives the result — with built-in slippage protection, MEV resistance, and no failed transactions. The solver absorbs execution risk.

This is not theoretical. CoW Swap, UniswapX, Across Protocol, and 1inch Fusion all run battle-tested solver auctions today. UniswapX and Across proposed ERC-7683, a standardized format for cross-chain intents, addressing the fragmentation problem where each protocol had invented its own intent format and workflow.

The LLM Layer: Natural Language as a DeFi Interface​

The missing piece that elevates intent architecture from a UX improvement to a paradigm shift is the large language model. LLMs translate unconstrained human language into structured, machine-executable intents — and they do it with contextual understanding that no dropdown menu can match.

Here is what this looks like in practice. A user tells an AI agent: "Rebalance my portfolio into high-yield stablecoins across three chains." The LLM decomposes this into:

  • Querying current portfolio positions across connected wallets
  • Fetching real-time APYs from Aave, Compound, Morpho, and Kamino across Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Solana
  • Factoring in gas costs, bridge fees, and impermanent loss risk
  • Generating a set of intents that, when executed, achieve the optimal rebalancing
  • Routing each intent to the appropriate solver network

The academic foundation for this is advancing rapidly. Researchers at the National University of Singapore developed the TIM (Transaction Intent Mining) framework, a multi-agent LLM system that uses a Meta-Level Planner to coordinate Domain Expert agents — each specialized in financial analysis, code analysis, or risk assessment. A Cognition Evaluator layer monitors outputs to mitigate hallucinations. In benchmarks, TIM significantly outperformed both single-LLM approaches and traditional machine learning models at correctly interpreting user transaction intents.

The practical implementations are already live:

  • Hey Anon, created by Daniele Sesta, uses natural language processing to simplify on-chain interactions. Users execute trades, stake tokens, and manage portfolios through conversational commands. It received $20 million in AI agent funding from DWF Labs and saw its ANON token surge from a $10 million to $130 million market cap.

  • Griffain, built by Solana core developer Tony Plasencia, lets users build and deploy custom AI agents for DeFi automation. Its invite-only platform supports tasks like dollar-cost averaging, token launching, and portfolio management. Market cap reached $390 million in early 2025.

  • NEUR, Solana's "smart co-pilot," is an open-source full-stack application combining LLMs with blockchain functionality, integrated with Jupiter, Pump.fun, and Magic Eden.

  • Orbit supports cross-chain DeFi operations across 100+ blockchains and around 200 protocols, acting as an AI-assisted companion for swaps, bridges, staking, and yield farming.

DeFAI's Four-Layer Architecture​

Modern DeFAI systems organize into four distinct layers, each solving a different part of the autonomy problem:

Layer 1: The AI Model Layer​

This is the computational brain — hosting machine learning models that examine market data, identify trends, forecast events, and generate actionable insights. The models range from transformer-based LLMs for natural language understanding to specialized quantitative models for price prediction, liquidity analysis, and risk scoring.

DGrid, which launched in January 2026 as the first Web3 decentralized gateway aggregation for AI inference, represents a critical piece of this layer. DGrid routes inference requests to optimal compute nodes based on staking and performance metrics. Its Proof of Quality (PoQ) mechanism uses cryptographic verification combined with game theory: Verification Nodes randomly sample and re-verify inference tasks, slashing staked $DGAI tokens from nodes that produce faulty outputs. This ensures every AI inference in the DeFAI stack is transparent, traceable, and auditable.

Layer 2: The Agent Layer​

AI agents serve as intermediaries between users and protocols. They interpret instructions, decompose complex goals into atomic operations, and interact directly with smart contracts. The Ethereum Foundation recognized the importance of this layer by launching its dAI Team in September 2025 specifically to support agentic payments and identity systems.

The standardization effort is centered on ERC-8004, finalized in August 2025, which establishes Identity, Reputation, and Validation registries for autonomous agents. This gives AI agents verifiable on-chain credentials — a prerequisite for any system where non-human actors manage meaningful value.

Layer 3: The Blockchain and Security Layer​

This is the settlement backbone. Agents execute and settle actions on-chain, with the blockchain verifying transactions, managing assets, and handling cross-chain interoperability. Layer-2 solutions — Optimism, Arbitrum, zkSync — compress transaction batches to achieve the throughput that agent-driven DeFi demands.

According to the a16z Crypto State of Crypto Report 2025, Ethereum with Layer-2s became the top choice for new developers building at the crypto-AI intersection. The throughput improvements matter directly: agent-driven strategies that rebalance across multiple protocols in real time cannot tolerate 12-second block confirmations and $5 gas fees.

Layer 4: The Feedback and Monitoring Layer​

This layer continuously tracks agent performance, validates outcomes against user intents, and feeds data back into the model layer for improvement. It is the quality assurance mechanism that separates production DeFAI systems from experiments — ensuring that agents actually deliver what users asked for and improving over time.

The Solver Economy: Where Competition Drives Execution Quality​

The solver model introduces a competitive marketplace that aligns incentives in ways traditional DeFi routing cannot. When a user submits an intent, multiple solvers compete to fulfill it. This competition drives down costs, improves execution speed, and provides built-in MEV protection — because solvers absorb the MEV risk rather than passing it to users.

Three forces are making 2026 the breakout year for intent-based systems:

Solver networks have matured. CoW Swap, UniswapX, Anoma, SUAVE, and Across now run professional-grade auctions with hundreds of solvers competing in real time, delivering near-perfect fill rates.

Chain abstraction is going mainstream. Projects like NEAR, Agoric, and Particle Network are erasing visible bridges, letting users declare cross-chain goals while solvers handle the multi-chain execution underneath.

LLMs make intent expression accessible. Aperture Finance's IntentsGPT interface translates natural language into a Domain Specific Language (DSL) that solvers can parse. The LLM mirrors the user's intent back in highly readable form for confirmation before broadcasting to the solver network.

However, the solver economy faces a centralization risk. True permissionless solvers — where anyone can run one and compete — remain rare. High-performance barriers favor well-funded teams with sophisticated infrastructure. Without robust decentralized order flow and credible neutrality mechanisms, solver networks could become oligopolies that are quietly worse than today's public mempool.

Security Architecture: Trust Without Trusting​

DeFAI's security model must address a novel threat surface: autonomous agents managing real value. The approach is multi-layered:

Behavioral baselines. Agents establish normal operating patterns for smart contracts and portfolio positions. Deviations trigger protective actions automatically — before exploits can drain funds.

Cryptographic verification. DGrid's Proof of Quality mechanism ensures that AI inference results are correct. Verification Nodes randomly re-execute tasks and slash dishonest compute providers.

On-chain credentials. ERC-8004 registries provide verifiable identity and reputation for agents. A lending protocol can check an agent's on-chain track record before extending credit, just as a bank checks a borrower's credit score.

Guardrails and circuit breakers. Most production DeFAI systems still require user-defined limits — maximum position sizes, approved protocols, risk tolerances. Full autonomy remains an aspiration rather than a deployed reality, and for good reason: the consequences of hallucination-driven transactions are measured in real money.

The Scale of What Is Coming​

The numbers frame the opportunity. CoinGecko lists over 550 AI agent crypto projects with a combined market cap of roughly $4.34 billion. Messari research projected DeFAI could reach $25–50 billion by late 2025. AI agents already drive an estimated 15–20 percent of decentralized finance volume.

NVIDIA has projected that the broader agent economy could exceed a trillion dollars. Even if the crypto-AI intersection captures a single-digit percentage of that value, the implications for on-chain infrastructure are enormous.

By mid-2026, agents could manage trillions in total value locked, functioning as "algorithmic whales" that provide liquidity, govern DAOs, and originate loans based on on-chain credit scores. The most successful DeFi participants may not be humans monitoring dashboards, but those deploying fleets of intelligent agents with carefully calibrated risk parameters.

The Challenges Nobody Wants to Talk About​

Three structural risks threaten DeFAI's trajectory:

Trust deficit. Users may hesitate to delegate financial authority to autonomous systems. Every high-profile agent malfunction — and there will be malfunctions — erodes confidence in the entire category.

Regulatory uncertainty. Legal frameworks for agent-driven actions are almost entirely undeveloped. When an autonomous agent executes a trade that violates securities law, who is liable — the user, the agent developer, or the solver?

Systemic risk. If hundreds of thousands of agents use similar models and similar data, they will converge on similar strategies. During market stress, this herd behavior could amplify crashes in ways that human traders, with their idiosyncratic decision-making, do not. DeFAI needs its own circuit breakers — and the industry has not built them yet.

The Bottom Line​

DeFAI is not a rebranding of existing AI-crypto narratives. It is a specific architectural thesis: large language models as the interface layer, intent-based execution as the transaction model, competitive solvers as the optimization engine, and verified autonomous agents as the operational backbone. Each layer solves a real problem — accessibility, execution quality, cost efficiency, and trustless coordination.

The infrastructure is live. The standards are being ratified. The funding is flowing. What remains is the hard work of making these systems reliable enough that users trust them with real capital, and resilient enough that they do not become the next systemic risk vector for decentralized finance.

For developers building at this intersection, the choice of infrastructure matters. The DeFAI stack demands low-latency blockchain access, reliable cross-chain data, and high-throughput node infrastructure that can keep pace with agent-driven transaction volumes.

BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade blockchain API access and node infrastructure across Ethereum, Solana, Sui, Aptos, and 20+ networks — the foundation layer that DeFAI agents need for reliable, high-throughput on-chain execution. Explore our API marketplace to build autonomous DeFi infrastructure designed for the agent era.

Sources:

Share on Twitter