Initia's Interwoven Rollups: Can This $350M L1+L2 Hybrid Escape the Graveyard of Ghost Chain L2s?
2025 became the year L2s went from blockchain's great hope to its greatest embarrassment. Most new rollups launched to fanfare, attracted millions in TVL during airdrop farming cycles, then collapsed into ghost towns within weeks of their token generation events. The mercenary capital moved on. The genuine users never arrived.
Yet amid this L2 fatigue, Initia launched its mainnet in April 2025 with a radically different proposition: what if instead of building yet another isolated L2, you built an entire network of interconnected rollups from the ground up—with native interoperability, shared liquidity, and VM flexibility baked into the architecture?
The market took notice. Initia raised $24 million from Delphi Ventures, Hack VC, Binance Labs, and Nascent—reaching a $350 million valuation before mainnet. Their token hit $1.44 within weeks of launch. More than a dozen L2s are already building on their infrastructure.
This is the story of Initia's bet that the L2 problem isn't too many chains—it's that those chains were never designed to work together.
The L2 Crisis: Why 2025 Became the Year of Ghost Chains
To understand what Initia is solving, you need to understand how badly the L2 narrative collapsed.
The promise was elegant: Ethereum couldn't scale, so we'd build rollups that inherit its security while processing transactions faster and cheaper. By early 2025, there were over 40 L2s competing for users. The reality? A brutal power-law distribution where Base captured the majority of new liquidity while most other L2s saw their TVLs stagnate or decline once incentive programs faded.
The pattern became depressingly predictable:
- Pre-TGE: L2 launches points program, attracting mercenary capital farming the airdrop
- TGE: Token launches, early farmers dump, liquidity migrates to the next farm
- Post-TGE: L2 becomes ghost town with single-digit DAU
The underlying problem wasn't execution—it was fragmentation. Users had ETH on Base but couldn't buy an NFT on Optimism without bridging. Developers built on one chain but couldn't access liquidity on another. Each L2 became an island, competing for the same pool of users rather than expanding the pie.
As Vitalik Buterin wrote in January 2025, the challenges facing L2s come down to "scale (blob space is barely covering the L2s and the use cases of today)" and "heterogeneity"—each rollup created by different actors, treated as different chains, following different standards.
Initia's Solution: Interwoven Rollups from Day One
Initia's founders—Ezaan Mangalji and Stan Liu, both Terraform Labs veterans—saw the fragmentation problem early. Their insight: you can't bolt interoperability onto isolated chains after the fact. You have to build it into the foundation.
The result is what Initia calls "interwoven rollups"—a two-layer architecture they term the Omnitia:
Layer 1 (Initia Base Chain): An orchestration layer built on Cosmos SDK that manages network security, consensus, governance, interoperability, liquidity, and inter-chain messaging. This isn't an execution layer competing with L2s—it's the coordination infrastructure that makes L2s work together.
Layer 2s (Minitias): Application-specific rollups that plug into the base chain. Each Minitia can customize its parameters while inheriting shared security, native bridging, and cross-chain communication from the L1.
The key innovation is the OPinit Stack—an optimistic rollup framework built from scratch for Cosmos SDK. Unlike the OP Stack or Arbitrum's framework, OPinit was designed specifically for the interwoven architecture, supporting fraud proofs and rollback capabilities while leveraging Celestia for data availability.
VM-Agnostic: Choose Your Execution Environment
Here's where Initia gets interesting for developers: Minitias aren't locked into a single virtual machine. Rollup teams can choose between:
- EVM: For Solidity developers and Ethereum ecosystem compatibility
- MoveVM: For developers preferring the Move language (originally from Diem/Aptos)
- WasmVM: For CosmWasm developers in the Cosmos ecosystem
This VM-agnostic approach solves a real problem. Developers have strong preferences for their execution environments—forcing everyone into EVM means losing Move and Wasm talent. But without interoperability, multi-VM ecosystems fragment.
Initia's breakthrough is cross-VM interoperability. Assets and messages can flow between EVM, Move, and Wasm rollups using IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication). A DeFi protocol on an EVM Minitia can interact with a gaming application on a Move Minitia without either needing to know the other's implementation details.
The performance numbers are promising: 500ms block times and theoretical throughput of 10,000 transactions per second across the network.
The Tokenomics: Aligning Incentives Against Mercenary Capital
Initia's token design specifically targets the mercenary farming problem that killed other L2s.
Total Supply: 1 billion INIT tokens
Allocation:
- Staking and Enshrined Liquidity: 25%
- Vested Interest Program (VIP): 25%
- Protocol Sales Investors: 15.25%
- Initia Contributors: 15%
- Airdrop: 5%
- Binance Launchpool: 3%
- Foundation: 5.25%
- Other (liquidity, marketing): 5.5%
The Vested Interest Program (VIP) is the most interesting mechanism. Rather than one-time airdrops that incentivize dump-and-run behavior, VIP distributes esINIT (escrowed INIT) to users who demonstrate sustained engagement—trading, providing liquidity, using applications.
These esINIT rewards vest over time or can be accelerated through staking, creating ongoing incentives rather than extraction events. It's an explicit bet against the farming-farming-dump cycle that destroyed other L2 ecosystems.
Investor tokens follow a 4-year vesting schedule (1 year locked, 3-year linear release), preventing early backers from dumping at TGE. The core team follows the same schedule.
Ecosystem: Who's Building on Initia?
More than a dozen L2s are building on Initia's infrastructure, with the testnet having attracted over 190,000 wallets before mainnet.
Key ecosystem partners include:
- Skip: Transaction ordering and MEV infrastructure
- Ethena: Stablecoin integration (USDe)
- Ether.fi: Liquid staking services
- Goldsky: Data indexing and analytics
The diversity of applications suggests real developer interest beyond farming:
- DeFi protocols leveraging cross-chain liquidity
- Gaming projects using MoveVM for complex game logic
- Enterprise solutions building permissioned Minitias
The Contro team documented their experience launching an L2 with Initia, highlighting the reduced complexity compared to building on isolated infrastructure.
The Competition: Superchains vs. Interwoven Rollups
Initia isn't the only attempt to solve L2 fragmentation. The OP Superchain (Optimism) and the emerging zkSync ecosystem both aim to create interconnected rollup networks.
OP Superchain Approach: Standardize on a single stack (OP Stack) and create shared sequencing, liquidity, and governance across member chains. Base, Optimism, Mode, and others share infrastructure.
zkSync Approach: ZK proofs enable trustless verification across chains, potentially allowing stronger security guarantees than optimistic rollups.
Initia's Differentiation:
- VM Flexibility: Unlike OP Superchain (EVM-only), Initia supports EVM, Move, and Wasm natively
- Native Architecture: Built as interwoven from day one, not retrofitted onto existing chains
- Cosmos Ecosystem: Access to IBC and the broader Cosmos interoperability layer
- Data Availability: Uses Celestia for DA rather than expensive Ethereum calldata
The tradeoff is ecosystem size. Base alone has more TVL than Initia's entire network. But Initia is betting that architectural advantages compound over time—especially as the limitations of retrofitted interoperability become apparent.
The $350M Question: Can Initia Escape L2 Fatigue?
Initia launched at a $350 million fully diluted valuation with $24 million raised. The INIT token reached an all-time high of $1.446 in May 2025 before correcting to around $0.50-0.60 as broader market conditions shifted.
Bull Case:
- Architectural advantages in VM flexibility and native interoperability attract developers frustrated by fragmented alternatives
- VIP tokenomics successfully retain users beyond initial farming cycles
- Cosmos ecosystem integration provides access to established DeFi liquidity
- Early ecosystem of 12+ Minitias creates network effects
Bear Case:
- L2 fatigue is real—users have limited attention for new ecosystems
- Base and OP Superchain have first-mover advantage and Coinbase distribution
- Cosmos SDK may limit EVM developer adoption despite compatibility layer
- $350M valuation sets high expectations for ecosystem growth
The December 2025 "Reactor Upgrade" enhanced interoperability and security, while the 2026 roadmap preview teased expanded DeFi integrations, gaming partnerships, and VIP program enhancements.
What Initia Gets Right About the L2 Problem
The core insight driving Initia's architecture deserves attention regardless of the project's ultimate success: interoperability can't be an afterthought.
The L2 landscape fractured because each rollup optimized for its own metrics without coordinating with others. Users ended up with assets scattered across chains, each requiring different bridges, wallets, and mental models.
Initia bets that the solution isn't fewer chains—it's chains designed to work together from the start. The Omnitia architecture, cross-VM messaging, and shared liquidity layer represent a genuine attempt to solve fragmentation at the infrastructure level rather than the application level.
Whether Initia specifically captures this opportunity depends on execution, ecosystem development, and timing. But the problem they're solving—making multichain feel like one chain—will define the next era of blockchain infrastructure.
The Bottom Line
Initia represents the most ambitious attempt yet to reimagine L2 architecture for a multichain world. Rather than competing on execution speed or fee reduction, they're competing on coordination—betting that the winning infrastructure will be the one that makes 50 rollups feel like one ecosystem.
The $350 million valuation and $24 million in funding from top-tier VCs reflect genuine excitement about this approach. The question is whether that excitement translates into sustained developer adoption and user retention, or whether Initia becomes another victim of the L2 fatigue it was designed to escape.
For builders evaluating where to launch their next application, Initia offers something genuinely different: an architecture built for interwoven rather than isolated chains, with VM flexibility that doesn't sacrifice interoperability. For investors, the VIP tokenomics represent a sophisticated attempt to align incentives against mercenary capital.
The next 12 months will reveal whether "interwoven rollups" is a breakthrough architecture or a clever rebrand. Given the scale of the L2 fragmentation problem, the industry needs at least one of these experiments to work.
Building cross-chain applications? BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade RPC endpoints and data APIs across Ethereum, Cosmos, Sui, Aptos, and 20+ other chains. Explore our API marketplace to power your multichain infrastructure.