Skip to main content

Crypto Treasuries Underwater: When Corporate Bitcoin Bets Turn Into GBTC-Style Discounts

· 10 min read
Dora Noda
Dora Noda
Software Engineer

What happens when the corporate world's Bitcoin bet starts trading like a distressed asset? Over 170 publicly traded companies now hold Bitcoin as treasury reserves, controlling roughly 5% of the circulating supply. But 2026 has brought a harsh reality check: the "premium era is over," and corporate Bitcoin holders are facing valuation discounts reminiscent of GBTC's darkest days.

The Premium Collapse: From 7x to Underwater​

For years, Bitcoin treasury companies commanded extraordinary market premiums. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) once traded at a sevenfold premium to its Bitcoin holdings. Metaplanet soared to a 237% premium in July 2025. Investors weren't just buying Bitcoin exposure—they were paying handsomely for the corporate wrapper, betting that management expertise and strategic vision added value beyond simple spot holdings.

Then the music stopped.

As of early 2026, Strategy trades at a 21% discount to its net asset value. Metaplanet has plunged to a 10% premium from its July peak. The metric that measures this—market-to-net-asset value (mNav)—tells a sobering story. When mNav sits at 3.0, investors pay $3 for every $1 of Bitcoin the company holds. Today, many are paying less than $1, signaling a fundamental crisis of confidence in the corporate treasury model.

This valuation collapse mirrors GBTC's notorious discount phase. Before converting to an ETF, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust traded at discounts as steep as 46% in early 2021, despite holding billions in Bitcoin. The culprit? Structural inefficiencies, redemption restrictions, and investor skepticism about paying premiums for what amounts to custodied Bitcoin.

Strategy's $17 Billion Quarterly Loss and MSCI's Sword of Damocles​

Michael Saylor's Strategy stands at the epicenter of this valuation crisis. The company holds 671,268 bitcoins (as of late 2025), representing roughly 62.9% of all Bitcoin held by the top 100 corporate holders. Acquired at an average cost basis of $66,400 per coin, these holdings have generated eye-watering unrealized losses.

For Q4 2025 alone, Strategy reported a staggering $17.44 billion unrealized loss as Bitcoin declined 25% during that quarter. For the full year 2025, unrealized losses on digital assets totaled $5.40 billion. The stock price has mirrored this pain, dropping 49.3% in 2025 amid aggressive share dilution to fund continued Bitcoin accumulation.

But the existential threat comes from MSCI. The index provider proposed reclassifying companies whose digital asset holdings exceed 50% of total assets as "funds," making them ineligible for key equity benchmarks. A final decision was slated for January 15, 2026.

The January 6 Reprieve—But Not a Pardon

On January 6, 2026, MSCI announced it would not exclude digital asset treasury companies, triggering a 2.5% stock surge. However, the devil is in the details: MSCI explicitly stated it won't increase Strategy's index weighting or allow size-segment migrations and will conduct a broader review. The sword still hangs by a thread.

JPMorgan estimates that an MSCI exclusion could trigger $8.8 billion in outflows if other index providers follow suit. For a stock already trading at a discount to its Bitcoin holdings, forced selling from index funds could create a devastating feedback loop—lower stock prices, deeper discounts, more redemptions, repeat.

GameStop's $420 Million Question: Exit or Custody?​

While Strategy doubles down, GameStop appears to be heading for the exits. In late January 2026, the gaming retailer transferred its entire Bitcoin holdings—approximately 4,710 BTC worth $420 million—to Coinbase Prime. The moves included 100 BTC on January 17 and 2,296 BTC on January 20.

Blockchain analytics firm CryptoQuant estimates GameStop accumulated its Bitcoin in May 2025 at an average price of around $107,900 per coin. At current prices, that represents unrealized losses of roughly $75-85 million. CEO Ryan Cohen's recent comments suggest the writing is on the wall: he's planning a "very, very, very big" acquisition of a consumer firm, calling the new plan "way more compelling than Bitcoin."

GameStop's transfer to Coinbase Prime could signal either:

  1. Imminent liquidation to fund acquisitions, locking in losses
  2. Institutional custody upgrade to professional-grade storage

The market is betting on the former. If GameStop dumps its holdings, it will mark one of the highest-profile corporate Bitcoin treasury exits—and validate critics who argued that retail and gaming companies had no business speculating on volatile digital assets.

The Discount Epidemic: How Many Companies Are Underwater?​

GameStop and Strategy aren't outliers. With over 170-190 publicly traded companies holding Bitcoin by late 2025, the discount epidemic is spreading:

  • Total corporate holdings: Approximately 1.13 million BTC (5.4% of maximum supply)
  • Top 100 companies: Hold 1,133,469 BTC
  • Geographic concentration: 71% of top 100 companies are US-based
  • Premium collapse: "The premium era is over," per Stacking Sats analyst John Fakhoury

What's driving the discount contagion?

1. Structural Inefficiency​

Corporate Bitcoin holders face the same fundamental question GBTC did: why pay a premium for custodied Bitcoin when spot ETFs offer seamless exposure with lower fees and better liquidity? The answer—management expertise, strategic vision, "Bitcoin yield" strategies—increasingly rings hollow as discounts persist.

2. Share Dilution Dynamics​

Companies like Strategy fund Bitcoin purchases through aggressive equity and convertible debt issuance. This creates a circular trap: dilution lowers per-share Bitcoin holdings, pressuring stock prices, deepening discounts, requiring more dilution to maintain accumulation pace.

3. Index Exclusion Risk​

MSCI's threat isn't isolated. If digital asset treasury companies get reclassified as "funds," they could be excluded from multiple benchmarks, forcing passive funds to dump shares. This creates systematic selling pressure unrelated to Bitcoin's underlying value.

4. Profit-Taking Skepticism​

Unlike Bitcoin held in cold storage or ETFs, corporate treasuries face shareholder pressure to eventually monetize holdings. Investors fear companies will be forced to sell during downturns to fund operations, manage debt, or appease activist investors—turning unrealized losses into permanent capital destruction.

The GBTC Parallel: Structure Matters More Than Holdings​

GBTC's journey from 50% premium to 46% discount and back to spot parity (post-ETF conversion) offers a cautionary blueprint:

Premium Phase (Pre-2021): Institutional investors paid hefty premiums for regulated Bitcoin exposure. GBTC was one of the few vehicles offering tax-advantaged accounts and regulatory comfort.

Discount Abyss (2021-2023): Spot ETF applications, redemption restrictions, and high fees crushed premiums. Investors realized they were overpaying for an inefficient structure.

Spot Parity (2024+): ETF conversion eliminated structural inefficiencies. GBTC now trades near NAV because investors can freely create/redeem shares.

Corporate Bitcoin treasuries are stuck in GBTC's discount phase without a clear path to redemption. Unlike an ETF, shareholders can't redeem their stock for underlying Bitcoin. Unlike a closed-end fund, there's no mechanism to force liquidation at NAV. The discount can persist indefinitely—or widen further.

What DAT Premium Volatility Means for 142+ Public Companies​

Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies now face a regime shift. The days of mNav multiples above 2.0 are gone. Going forward, investors will demand:

1. Operational Excellence Beyond Hodling​

Companies can't justify premiums by simply holding Bitcoin. They need differentiated strategies: Bitcoin-backed lending, mining integration, Lightning Network infrastructure, or actual software/services revenue streams.

2. Capital Discipline Over Accumulation at Any Cost​

Aggressive share dilution to buy more Bitcoin is value-destructive when trading at discounts. Companies must prove they can generate returns on existing holdings before raising more capital.

3. Liquidity and Redemption Mechanisms​

Closed-end Bitcoin funds with redemption provisions trade closer to NAV than corporate holdcos. Companies may need to explore tender offers, share buybacks, or Bitcoin distribution mechanisms to close discounts.

4. Index and Regulatory Clarity​

Until MSCI, S&P, and other index providers establish clear, stable rules for digital asset companies, index exclusion risk will persist as a discount driver.

The Path Forward: Evolution or Extinction?​

Corporate Bitcoin treasuries face three possible futures:

Scenario 1: Structural Reform Companies adopt ETF-like features—Bitcoin redemption rights, net asset value disclosure, independent custody verification. Discounts narrow as structural inefficiencies disappear.

Scenario 2: Consolidation Wave Discounted treasuries become M&A targets. Private equity or crypto-native firms buy companies trading below NAV, liquidate Bitcoin, and pocket the spread.

Scenario 3: Permanent Discount Regime DAT companies become "Bitcoin holding companies" trading at persistent 20-40% discounts, similar to closed-end funds. Only deep-value investors participate.

The market is currently pricing Scenario 3. Strategy's 21% discount, GameStop's apparent exit, and MSCI's ongoing review suggest investors see corporate Bitcoin treasuries as structurally flawed vehicles for digital asset exposure.

Building on Foundations That Last​

For developers and enterprises navigating the intersection of blockchain infrastructure and corporate finance, the corporate treasury saga offers critical lessons. While speculative Bitcoin holdings face valuation volatility, production infrastructure demands reliability, compliance, and operational excellence.

BlockEden.xyz provides enterprise-grade blockchain APIs and node infrastructure for developers building on Ethereum, Solana, Sui, Aptos, and 30+ chains. Whether you're building DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, or Web3 applications, our infrastructure is designed for uptime, scalability, and regulatory clarity. Explore our API marketplace to build on foundations that don't trade at discounts to their utility.

Conclusion: When the Premium Era Ends​

The corporate Bitcoin treasury experiment is undergoing its first real stress test. What looked like visionary capital allocation at $60K Bitcoin now appears as reckless speculation at current valuations. The premium era is over, and the discount epidemic reveals a fundamental truth: structure matters more than holdings.

GBTC's transformation from premium darling to discounted liability and back to efficient ETF shows the path forward—but corporate treasuries can't easily replicate that journey. Without redemption mechanisms, operational moats, or regulatory clarity, DAT companies may remain trapped in discount purgatory.

For the 170+ public companies holding Bitcoin, 2026 will separate strategic visionaries from overhyped holdcos. The market has spoken: it's no longer enough to simply hodl. Companies must prove they add value beyond custodying an asset investors can access more efficiently elsewhere.

Sources:

Share on Twitter