Modular Blockchains Explained: How Celestia, EigenDA, and Ethereum Blobs Enable the Next Generation

As a blockchain architect studying modular design, I want to explain the modular blockchain thesis and why it’s the future of scalability.

The Modular Thesis:

Traditional blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum) are monolithic:

  • Execution (running transactions)
  • Data availability (storing transaction data)
  • Consensus (agreeing on order)
  • Settlement (final state)

All happen on ONE chain.

The Problem:

Trilemma: Can’t optimize all three:

  • Decentralization
  • Security
  • Scalability

Pick two.

The Modular Solution:

Separate concerns into specialized layers:

Layer 1: Settlement (Ethereum)

  • Final source of truth
  • Dispute resolution
  • Security anchor

Layer 2: Execution (Rollups)

  • Run transactions off-chain
  • Post compressed proofs to L1
  • 100x cheaper than L1

Layer 3: Data Availability (Celestia, EigenDA)

  • Store transaction data
  • Not execution, just storage
  • 99% cheaper than Ethereum calldata

Layer 4: Consensus (varies)

  • Each layer has own consensus
  • Doesn’t need to be coupled

Why This Works:

Specialization beats generalization.

Ethereum trying to do everything:

  • 15 TPS
  • $5-20 per transaction
  • 12s finality

Modular stack (Arbitrum + Celestia + Ethereum):

  • 10,000+ TPS (rollup capacity)
  • $0.01 per transaction
  • 1-2s finality (on rollup)

Key Innovation: Data Availability Layers

This is THE breakthrough.

Before: Rollups posted data to Ethereum (expensive)
After: Rollups post data to Celestia/EigenDA (99% cheaper)

Celestia:

  • First modular DA layer
  • Data availability sampling (light nodes verify without downloading all data)
  • $0.81/MB vs Ethereum’s $100/MB

EigenDA:

  • Uses Ethereum restaking
  • Even cheaper than Celestia
  • 100+ rollups committed

Ethereum Blobs (EIP-4844):

  • Native blob space on Ethereum
  • Cheaper than calldata
  • But still 10x more expensive than Celestia

The Tradeoffs:

Monolithic (Solana):

  • :white_check_mark: Atomic composability (everything on one chain)
  • :white_check_mark: Simple mental model
  • :white_check_mark: Unified liquidity
  • :cross_mark: Hard to scale beyond hardware limits
  • :cross_mark: Less customizable

Modular (Ethereum rollup ecosystem):

  • :white_check_mark: Unlimited scalability (spawn more rollups)
  • :white_check_mark: Customizable (each rollup optimized)
  • :white_check_mark: Ethereum security
  • :cross_mark: Fragmented liquidity
  • :cross_mark: Complex UX (bridging)
  • :cross_mark: No atomic composability across rollups

Real-World Adoption:

2023:

  • Celestia launches mainnet
  • EIP-4844 activates on Ethereum
  • 20+ rollups live

2025:

  • 50+ rollups
  • $40B TVL
  • Celestia securing 40+ rollups
  • EigenDA launching

Use Cases:

When to use modular:

  • DeFi (security-critical, needs Ethereum settlement)
  • Payments (needs scale)
  • Enterprise (needs customization)

When to use monolithic:

  • Gaming (needs low latency, atomic composability)
  • High-frequency trading (needs atomic composability)
  • Consumer apps (needs simple UX)

The Future:

2027 Prediction:

  • 100+ rollups
  • Celestia + EigenDA dominate DA
  • Ethereum as settlement layer
  • 10M+ TPS total capacity
  • $100B+ TVL on rollups

Bottom line: Modular is winning because specialization beats monolithic design for scalability.